Scientist.com reviews about "pay"

-You won't receive quality mentorship here -Your best interest is not looked out for -Very difficult to advance -Extremely disorganized environment -The company does not set you up to be successful -No training provided -Upper management does not prioritize mentorship, leadership follow ups, or career direction -Too many company hands in different baskets -Roles and responsibilities are unclear -Lack of team support -Very confusing atmosphere / a bit pretentious

High-school-like cliques; you're either in or out, resulting in an abundance of gossip and "Mean Girl" behavior Favoritism of certain employees and no real structure for annual promotions If your opinion disagrees with management too often, you most likely will be looking for new employment Well thought out cross functional team developed projects will change at the whim of the CEO last moment-- and not in a "keep up with a fast paced environment," or, " you need to be adaptable," way. Company culture only really exists if you are located at headquarters or in "the club"-- otherwise you have to fight for your rights and are left out of social events, meetings, company retreats, etc.

Pay is low relative to other software engineering roles, one of the small benefits we had for remote workers (being able to get remote takeout lunches) was replaced with a stipend for less than half the value