I applied online. I interviewed at Supono Holdings (Limassol, Limassol)
Interview
there are a bunch of fake jobs has been posting. they send an email for screening call then you will record a video then a (guy) calls you and tell you, hey what'sup , it there any question which you want ask? (!). Then they disappear for 2 months and after that they send you an email let's get screen call again (!). seems they are laundering.
I applied through other source. I interviewed at Supono Holdings (Limassol, Limassol) in Feb 2025
Interview
The first interviewer was friendly and informative, sharing details about the company and its overall direction. The second interview, however, was less pleasant: another HR representative took a phone call during our conversation and spoke while I was still on the line.
The test assignment was demanding - create a game-ready stylized character, complete with rigging and a walk-cycle animation, in just three working days. They also asked me to sign an NDA specifically for this test model, something I’d never encountered before.
After I submitted the source files, I immediately received a standard rejection email with boilerplate text (which I discovered in my spam folder a few days later). There was no feedback or personal follow-up.
I'm happy that I didn't get into that company, and highly suspicious that my model can be used somwhere in actual projects.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
No technical interview, just test task (creating game-ready stylized character with rig and walking-cycle animation in 3 working days)
I applied in-person. The process took 5 weeks. I interviewed at Supono Holdings in Apr 2025
Interview
Initially, everything was clearly explained. I completed the first part, which required a lot of time and effort. Realistically, the first part can only be completed on time if you work 10+ hours a day — very difficult if you're already employed and looking for another job. I informed them I wouldn't make it on time, and they granted me an extension, which I appreciate.
However, after I submitted part one, communication basically stalled. They responded to each of my emails only after two weeks, and the discussion about the second part dragged on for over a month.
Then, out of nowhere, it turned out that part two was a native iOS app built from scratch, even though originally we discussed just updating the existing Flutter project. When I pointed this out, they simply replied with something like “do whatever you think is best.” Later, they informed me that they would not consider my application without part two.
No one took responsibility for the clear inconsistency between the original instructions and the updated task. They just calmly stated that “this is the correct version” — and that was it.
No one admitted the mistake, and there was no recognition of the time I invested.
It genuinely felt like they weren’t hiring at all, but rather just trying to collect architectural approaches, state management strategies, and tech stacks used in real-world apps. This impression was reinforced by the shifting requirements and complete lack of professionalism in communication.
Conclusion:
Communication — slow and unprofessional
Requirements — change without explanation
Accountability — nonexistent
Process — seems like a way to crowdsource ideas from candidates for free
Unfortunately, this kind of approach is far from the professional culture I want to be part of. Don’t waste your time. Not recommended.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Initially, the hiring process was a two-part process: building an app using Flutter, and then making fixes and improvements to the first part. But they change it along the way.