1.5
Be the first to recommend this company
Pros
Great people Grind culture Fast paced A lot of things happening simultaneous
Cons
Change can be tough Sometimes things do feel rushed
Pros
A lot of nice people at the company.
Cons
Leadership operated with a level of ego and overconfidence that consistently got in the way of professionalism, accountability, and realistic decision-making. Constructive feedback did not seem welcome, and disagreement was often treated as disloyalty rather than collaboration. There was also a noticeable culture of favoritism/nepotism and insider relationships that affected hiring, promotions, and influence within the company. Merit did not always appear to be the deciding factor. A recurring issue was the disconnect between internal reality and external messaging. Employees were regularly encouraged to believe extremely optimistic narratives around growth, product maturity, and customer success that did not match what many teams were seeing firsthand. Turnover was relentless, morale was unstable, and abrupt departures became normalized. Entire teams operated under constant uncertainty, while leadership often appeared more focused on image and optics than on building sustainable processes or supporting employees effectively. There are talented people working there, but the environment created by management made it difficult to trust leadership, plan long term, or feel confident in the company’s direction.
Pros
Aside from the colleagues, there’s nothing particularly professional about this company. The experience has felt quite misleading.
Cons
Where do I start. The product is essentially a wrapper around third-party AI models pointed at public medical databases. Anyone with basic coding knowledge could build the same thing in a weekend now. Despite this, the company keeps hiring engineers and designers at a pace that makes no sense for a single product that still doesn’t work properly. Customers have asked for refunds. Version after version gets started and abandoned before the previous one is even finished or tested with real users. Almost every leadership position is held by someone personally connected to the CEO — spouse runs HR, best friends in product and engineering, family members in finance. You won’t find this out until you’re already deep in. Good luck raising any concerns when everything circles back to the same people. Confidentiality doesn’t exist here. Original employees built everything, asked for promised equity, got fired with made-up performance reasons. The company spends more on social media content, photo shoots, video productions, and team-building events (5-6 per month at one point) than on actual R&D. It looks great on Instagram. The reality inside is very different. There’s no real product roadmap. No user research. No customer feedback loops. Just vibes, investor demos, and a new office announcement every quarter. Design decisions get overruled for “visual appeal” with zero regard for actual usability or UX. If you care about craft, you will be frustrated here.
Check out your Company Bowl for anonymous work chats.