Great for slackers and people with no ambition - Associate Software Engineer Anaplan Employee Review

2.0
25 Feb 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

For the whole year I was at the company, there were practically no deadlines for anything. Coasting and taking your time is encouraged. Remote working. Most people are friendly and helpful, pleasant to work with. Smaller teams helps build rapport. Good work-life balance. Hackathons. Nice office. Great onboarding material for the product itself. Collaborative environment. Good people. Company cares about well-being.

Cons

A slow-moving "big corporate" where there's no passion or drive. Lots of red tape. I did barely any programming during my time at the company, despite emphasizing this as my main desire (it's not just me either, others feel the same way). Deep management hierarchies and top-down leadership who bring in sudden policy changes without consultation means your manager is basically powerless. Engineers are treated as bodies to throw at any problems the company has with zero regard for what their interests and expertise/skillsets. Priorities change all the time. You're basically treated as "just another cog in the machine", but given no actual onboarding or training required to do your job. They expect you to wear many different hats and do "DevOps" type work. Jira tickets will appear on your team's Kanban with zero explanation and sometimes no detail at all on them, that have no development involved whatsoever. If you are lucky enough to ever touch your IDE, it will be trivial bug fixes or config changes. Feature development is tedious due to the company's horrendously complicated build & release pipelines and properties, despite multiple teams working on this full-time to improve it. Despite having QAs, SREs, Level 3 support, network engineers, platform engineers and dedicated teams for infrastructure, regular devs are expected to be involved in day-to-day operations and infrastructure problems that is beyond the scope of what a software developer ought to be doing: this is rationalised as "we're engineers, not developers". The whole notion of "reactive" and on-call policy is not at all well-thought out; by the company's own admission, nobody is expected to have the answers, but are nonetheless required to participate and effectively act as a "call centre" for production incidents. There is zero attempt at onboarding people onto the tooling (e.g. Splunk) and the company's legacy codebase. Lots of time is wasted in refinement sessions and other meetings. Corporate all-hands meetings are a hilarious joke that people laugh about on private channels because they're very American and basically showbiz rather than anything substantial. Too many Slack channels.

avatar
Anaplan Response
4y
Thank you for your review. It’s great to hear you recognize the effort and intention we put into our employees’ well-being, including a good work life balance. We trust our employees to work independently and encourage them to explore new ideas and ways to creatively solve problems, which means things tend to move quickly around here. We also recognize how important it is for both management and leadership to prioritize your individual career path and enable you to grow to your fullest potential and are actively evaluating where we can improve when it comes to employee development. We’re proud of the strong workplace culture and values we have today but recognize this may not be the right fit for everyone.

Explore other reviews about Anaplan

5.0
8 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Collaborative & Inclusive culture - Commitment to well-being - Professional growth & learning - Market leading innovation - Work flexibility

Cons

Anaplan is the place to be!

2.0
7 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

One thing I genuinely appreciated was that the C-suite seemed invested in keeping everyone in the loop. The monthly town halls felt like more than just a formality and gave you a real sense of where the company was headed. When you had a good stretch, people noticed. The company feels like it has real momentum and on a macro level.

Cons

Leadership was inconsistent in my experience and seemed to depend heavily on which manager you ended up with. It often felt like luck of the draw. I personally found the planning process to be more reactive than strategic, with urgency only kicking in once results were already suffering rather than getting ahead of it. The workplace culture also had a gossip element that I found draining over time. My biggest frustration was around performance recognition. I observed situations where reported numbers didn't seem to reflect reality, yet the consequences appeared minimal at best. I would have liked to see more transparency and accountability around how top performers were identified and rewarded, because in my experience the current approach didn't always feel equitable to those who were playing by the rules.

1
avatar
Anaplan Response
1w
We appreciate you sharing such a detailed reflection of your time with us. It is encouraging to hear that our commitment to transparency through monthly town halls and our company's momentum resonated with you. Fostering a trusting, equitable workplace where everyone is fairly recognized and rewarded is central to our culture. We wish you the very best in your future endeavors.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All