Good training, but inconsistent workload and lack of technical engagement - Network Architect CGI Employee Review

2.0
21 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good access to training and certifications Flexible working and fully remote model Generally professional environment

Cons

Workload can be inconsistent, with periods of underutilisation despite full-time allocation. Limited hands-on technical work for architects, with most implementation done by consultants. Frequent movement between contracts makes it hard to build continuity or deliver meaningful impact. Onboarding onto new projects is often slow and lacks documentation Lack of visibility on future work and technology direction. Communication can be inconsistent, with limited 1:1s and slow responses on collaboration tools. Knowledge sharing is not always effective and can be siloed. Design standards and quality vary significantly between accounts, making it harder to move between projects

Explore other reviews about CGI

5.0
20 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

A great environment of people

Cons

No major cons while employed

1.0
16 Jun 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

no specific positives to highlight from my perspective

Cons

I worked at CGI in both India and the USA and observed similar workplace culture concerns across both locations. The only real difference was HR—India HR felt more supportive, while my experience with USA HR was disappointing. My employment ended shortly after maternity leave due to an alleged “lack of projects,” which I experienced as a layoff. I also observed what appeared to be misuse of position by some leaders, including blurred professional boundaries, preferential treatment, and expectations that went beyond normal workplace roles—at times resembling personal-assistant-style demands rather than professional conduct. Surprisingly, I also noticed inconsistent “policies” applied differently to different individuals. In some cases, it felt like the rules changed depending on who you were. When leadership became aware that someone was related to another employee in the organization, it sometimes felt like that person was singled out or targeted rather than treated objectively. Overall, these practices—whether through inconsistent treatment, perceived power misuse, or favoritism—undermine trust, damage workplace culture, and raise serious concerns about fairness and professionalism.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All