DO NOT WORK HERE UNLESS YOU ARE LAZY AND JUST WANT A PAYCHECK - Consultant CGI Employee Review

1.0
25 Aug 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Good work life balance - IF YOU ONLY WANT A PAYCHECK OR CAN'T FIND ANOTHER JOB USE THIS AS A STEPPING STONE

Cons

- You are being underpaid (go look at Accenture, Deloitte, etc.) - The benefits are terrible - They will try to keep you underpaid on purpose (my starting class only got raises because we found out new hires were making more than we were, even though we had a year of experience, management was unhappy we found out) - This is NOT consulting. You will learn their ERP system and implement it. - There is NO career path. Ask in your interview for materials on the career path, they will not be able to provide nor explain. - There is NO pay bump for being promoted to Senior Consultant - You can be assigned to a Help Desk job where you are just an IT resource doing nothing but answering bug tickets. Assignments are random after MAP (3 months of training) - If you ever end up working >40 hours they offer you "flex time" which is supposed to be time that you are allowed to take off the following week. You can't take this time because they'll give you bad performance reviews, or they will just tell you they need you to work 40 hours. They will do everything in their power to make you work without paying you what you earned. - If you work in Federal you will be told you need to become a SME to advance, so you are pigeonholing your career as a government/government contract employee and gaining few other skills

Explore other reviews about CGI

5.0
18 Jun 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Work life balance, growth, quality

Cons

Less pay compared to market

1.0
16 Jun 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

no specific positives to highlight from my perspective

Cons

I worked at CGI in both India and the USA and observed similar workplace culture concerns across both locations. The only real difference was HR—India HR felt more supportive, while my experience with USA HR was disappointing. My employment ended shortly after maternity leave due to an alleged “lack of projects,” which I experienced as a layoff. I also observed what appeared to be misuse of position by some leaders, including blurred professional boundaries, preferential treatment, and expectations that went beyond normal workplace roles—at times resembling personal-assistant-style demands rather than professional conduct. Surprisingly, I also noticed inconsistent “policies” applied differently to different individuals. In some cases, it felt like the rules changed depending on who you were. When leadership became aware that someone was related to another employee in the organization, it sometimes felt like that person was singled out or targeted rather than treated objectively. Overall, these practices—whether through inconsistent treatment, perceived power misuse, or favoritism—undermine trust, damage workplace culture, and raise serious concerns about fairness and professionalism.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All