Great people, great pay, limited opportunities for career growth - Senior Consultant CGI Employee Review

4.0
20 May 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

It seems like everyone I meet at this company is genuine, friendly, and helpful. I joined CGI out of college and in 3 years my salary has increased by 40%. My managers have always had my back and have worked with me closely for finding project opportunities. The benefits are great - particularly the Share Purchase Program, in which CGI matches 100% of your Invesment in CGI stock up to 3% of your salary.

Cons

Opportunities for career development are relatively limited. Career growth for the most part is limited to CGI specific IP. This is great if you want to work at the company for the long-term and don't mind being a "SME" in CGI's software. However, this can be limiting if you are a young professional looking to explore career paths and build transferrable skills. Work culture has taken a hit as the reverberations of covid policies have lingered. Limited travel + limited office interactions has left me personally feeling disconnected from the company and the people I work with. Even those living in my city don't seem to give a hoot about connecting and socializing with one another.

Explore other reviews about CGI

5.0
18 Jun 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Work life balance, growth, quality

Cons

Less pay compared to market

1.0
16 Jun 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

no specific positives to highlight from my perspective

Cons

I worked at CGI in both India and the USA and observed similar workplace culture concerns across both locations. The only real difference was HR—India HR felt more supportive, while my experience with USA HR was disappointing. My employment ended shortly after maternity leave due to an alleged “lack of projects,” which I experienced as a layoff. I also observed what appeared to be misuse of position by some leaders, including blurred professional boundaries, preferential treatment, and expectations that went beyond normal workplace roles—at times resembling personal-assistant-style demands rather than professional conduct. Surprisingly, I also noticed inconsistent “policies” applied differently to different individuals. In some cases, it felt like the rules changed depending on who you were. When leadership became aware that someone was related to another employee in the organization, it sometimes felt like that person was singled out or targeted rather than treated objectively. Overall, these practices—whether through inconsistent treatment, perceived power misuse, or favoritism—undermine trust, damage workplace culture, and raise serious concerns about fairness and professionalism.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All