Initial Outlook Seemed Promising..... - Lead Technical Consultant Infosys Employee Review

3.0
11 Sept 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I worked with a good group of individuals in my area of expertise and assignments provided the opportunity to learn new technologies and tools, while interfacing with various clients. If you end up working on a good team, the work and environment could be good, as I experienced during my time here.

Cons

HR at this location is useless and tends to exhibit an attitude when they can't address your questions. They tend to drop the ball, if they can't provide answers to your questions. Decent benefits, but salaries are way below par. US based employees are subject to India centric authorization process approvals in order to get anything done. Which is slow and frustrating at times. I spent more time trying to complete reports, time sheets and travel expenses, as I did working, due to slow internal system tools being used and maintained in India.

Explore other reviews about Infosys

5.0
8 Jan 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

good environment, opportunity to learn

Cons

Bad pay. barely pay to

4.0
10 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Job stability – Infosys is known for long-term employment and steady projects. Strong brand value – Having Infosys on your resume adds credibility and global recognition. Good learning opportunities – Access to internal learning platforms, certifications, and training programs (especially for freshers). Global exposure – Opportunities to work with international clients and global delivery teams. Structured processes – Well-defined policies, documentation, and governance. Work-life balance (project dependent) – Many teams offer reasonable working hours. Employee benefits – Health insurance, paid leaves, and wellness initiatives. Safe and inclusive workplace – Strong focus on ethics, compliance, and diversity.

Cons

Salary growth can be slow – Compensation increments may be lower compared to market standards. Limited flexibility in role changes – Internal mobility and project switches can take time. Bureaucratic processes – Decision-making can be slow due to multiple approval layers. Project allocation delays – Bench time and delayed onboarding to projects can happen. Variable learning exposure – Skill growth depends heavily on the project assigned. Less innovation in some teams – Certain projects may use legacy technologies. Onsite opportunities are limited – Compared to earlier years, onsite roles are fewer. Performance appraisal transparency – Rating systems may feel rigid or unclear.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All