Odd mix of good and bad - Anonymous employee Infosys Employee Review

4.0
8 May 2010
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

1. Very good offshore delivery capabilities. Have rarely seen project work quality getting affected despite process issues 2. Quite ethical in financial matters, with employees and customers 3. Investments in processes, people and infrastructure to control at least some of the challenges of running business 4. Good brand name. Financially sound

Cons

1. Very conservative outlook. Management loves to try and hide behind processes but it is very clear to everyone else that rules are for denying things to most while get modified for few 2. Lack of work life balance for most 'working people'. I think onsite people spend close to 12 hours per day at work at a minimum - if you include offshore calls plus regulard work. 3. Too much focus on 'Next Billion'. Too many good, grounds up ideas get killed as they will not get the next bilion in next 6 six months..

Explore other reviews about Infosys

5.0
11 May 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good company to work with

Cons

growth may be factor to consider

4.0
10 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Job stability – Infosys is known for long-term employment and steady projects. Strong brand value – Having Infosys on your resume adds credibility and global recognition. Good learning opportunities – Access to internal learning platforms, certifications, and training programs (especially for freshers). Global exposure – Opportunities to work with international clients and global delivery teams. Structured processes – Well-defined policies, documentation, and governance. Work-life balance (project dependent) – Many teams offer reasonable working hours. Employee benefits – Health insurance, paid leaves, and wellness initiatives. Safe and inclusive workplace – Strong focus on ethics, compliance, and diversity.

Cons

Salary growth can be slow – Compensation increments may be lower compared to market standards. Limited flexibility in role changes – Internal mobility and project switches can take time. Bureaucratic processes – Decision-making can be slow due to multiple approval layers. Project allocation delays – Bench time and delayed onboarding to projects can happen. Variable learning exposure – Skill growth depends heavily on the project assigned. Less innovation in some teams – Certain projects may use legacy technologies. Onsite opportunities are limited – Compared to earlier years, onsite roles are fewer. Performance appraisal transparency – Rating systems may feel rigid or unclear.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All