Slavery of 21st Century - Process Executive Infosys Employee Review

2.0
31 Jan 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Infosys is good company to start with them at the beginning of your work life, because the company provides a good system of trainings and a person can learn a lot of things for forthcoming job oportunities.

Cons

Trainings are provided, but now Infosys usually ends up. Salaries at Infosys are really ridiculous low and when somebody does more and more, Infosys won't increase the salary anymore. Personal growth is possible at Infosys, because Infosys has massive fluctuace of employees what I've never ever seen before.

Explore other reviews about Infosys

5.0
20 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

good work environment provides opportunity to learn

Cons

I had a good work experience, had no cons

4.0
10 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Job stability – Infosys is known for long-term employment and steady projects. Strong brand value – Having Infosys on your resume adds credibility and global recognition. Good learning opportunities – Access to internal learning platforms, certifications, and training programs (especially for freshers). Global exposure – Opportunities to work with international clients and global delivery teams. Structured processes – Well-defined policies, documentation, and governance. Work-life balance (project dependent) – Many teams offer reasonable working hours. Employee benefits – Health insurance, paid leaves, and wellness initiatives. Safe and inclusive workplace – Strong focus on ethics, compliance, and diversity.

Cons

Salary growth can be slow – Compensation increments may be lower compared to market standards. Limited flexibility in role changes – Internal mobility and project switches can take time. Bureaucratic processes – Decision-making can be slow due to multiple approval layers. Project allocation delays – Bench time and delayed onboarding to projects can happen. Variable learning exposure – Skill growth depends heavily on the project assigned. Less innovation in some teams – Certain projects may use legacy technologies. Onsite opportunities are limited – Compared to earlier years, onsite roles are fewer. Performance appraisal transparency – Rating systems may feel rigid or unclear.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All