Tobacco factory - Senior Technology Architect Infosys Employee Review

1.0
11 Mar 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The genuine good junior guys hired from india

Cons

Since 2014 a bunch of people came in that implemented a slave camp, both in AAB and Liberty global. Overall across all accounts in Europe it was the same, a pathetic runaway of all senior capable people and a career for the slave camp managers. This goes as high as NRM who had his CEO run away also. He is the ultimate meat butcher, and promotes equivalent employees locally. I saw 3 generations of architects across europe and employees in the netherlands running away. It was so sad.

Explore other reviews about Infosys

5.0
8 Jan 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

good environment, opportunity to learn

Cons

Bad pay. barely pay to

4.0
10 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Job stability – Infosys is known for long-term employment and steady projects. Strong brand value – Having Infosys on your resume adds credibility and global recognition. Good learning opportunities – Access to internal learning platforms, certifications, and training programs (especially for freshers). Global exposure – Opportunities to work with international clients and global delivery teams. Structured processes – Well-defined policies, documentation, and governance. Work-life balance (project dependent) – Many teams offer reasonable working hours. Employee benefits – Health insurance, paid leaves, and wellness initiatives. Safe and inclusive workplace – Strong focus on ethics, compliance, and diversity.

Cons

Salary growth can be slow – Compensation increments may be lower compared to market standards. Limited flexibility in role changes – Internal mobility and project switches can take time. Bureaucratic processes – Decision-making can be slow due to multiple approval layers. Project allocation delays – Bench time and delayed onboarding to projects can happen. Variable learning exposure – Skill growth depends heavily on the project assigned. Less innovation in some teams – Certain projects may use legacy technologies. Onsite opportunities are limited – Compared to earlier years, onsite roles are fewer. Performance appraisal transparency – Rating systems may feel rigid or unclear.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All