SAIC (Leidos) - Mixed Bag - Project Manager Leidos Employee Review

1.0
4 Jan 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

When SAIC was an employee-owned company, it was a respected and good place to work. You really felt valued as an employee. That changed when the company went public and eventually split into two companies. The old SAIC was known for hiring excellent people, and many of them are still with Leidos.

Cons

I worked on a new contract where the leadership was quickly staffed with newly retired colonels who never knew or were schooled in SAIC's culture of being a flattish company of professionals rather than a rigid hierarchy where decisions were made top to down, and after I left there were several ethics issues that were reported to corporate management. If you are joining Leidos, be sure to connect and talk with former employees via LinkedIn so you have a good feel for the culture of the project or task order you may be joining.

Explore other reviews about Leidos

5.0
7 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Large companies. Willingness to work with you.

Cons

Low paying. No hybrid opportunity

3.0
27 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Cons

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All