Toxic - Anonymous employee Leidos Employee Review

2.0
31 Aug 2023
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Worked in maritime group. Was able to learn a lot and experience very cool technology.

Cons

Toxic workplace. An individual runs the group will hire junior engineers and yell at them for not meeting expectations. Individuals are in managerial positions and are only a couple years out of college and manage people who have more experience and knowledge than they do. Obvious lies to customer and unrealistic timelines. Certain individuals seem to be able to attend every trip to customer locations and enjoy expensive dinners and parties, while underpaying engineers getting the work done. They hired people with more experience and then those people made improvements to the system and were yelled at and told to make things worse again. Withholding information from junior engineers, then dropping a deadline and forcing what are essentially children in the workplace to work over the weekend. Making incorrect purchases, thousands wasted on purchasing the wrong type of cards or servers, and the engineers doing the work aren’t even consulted beforehand. A new engineer on his 4th week was harshly yelled at in front of me for a mistake he didn’t even make. This is just the tip of the ice berg

Explore other reviews about Leidos

5.0
15 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great culture, supportive management, encouragement for self development

Cons

Some decisions move too slowly.

3.0
27 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Cons

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All