Avoid Sales roles - Sales Executive Slalom Employee Review

1.0
17 Apr 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

People are generally great and it seemed like a decent place to work if you're a Consultant.

Cons

Still very localized in terms of sales team structure, which means you have local market leaders (former Consultants) running the sales teams. Very little direction from corporate, other than an awful company-wide sales comp plan. Plan was based on billed revenue and local leadership made the numbers high enough to where quarterly bonuses were virtually impossible, since you aren't paid any % unless you hit the astronomical goal. Zero ramp-up period when joining so you're expected to sell $500-750k+ in net-new billed revenue in each Quarter, with no existing book of business and very few existing MSA's. Average deal size across Slalom is $300k. Sales is used as a marketing, cold calling, and "who do you know" engine before they move on to a firm that appreciates the role.

Explore other reviews about Slalom

5.0
25 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Work life balance is great

Cons

Pay for roles should be higher

1
2.0
13 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

In a tough economic climate, the role still provides steady employment.

Cons

The workplace environment is hostile to women. During a recent large‑scale reorganization of the data team, no women were on the planning team. After the reshuffle, many capable women who previously supervised several people were reassigned to roles with no direct reports, while men were placed into respectable leadership positions. Advancement requires submitting an application, proving competence, and presenting a business case. Strangely, if the company is already hiring for a comparable role at the desired level, that doesn't count as a business case. Female representation in senior roles is extremely low; the sole woman I’ve observed appears vastly more qualified than her male peers at the same level. The promotion and evaluation system is riddled with bias. Decisions are made in group meetings where senior leaders discuss each subordinate and vote collectively—a process marketed as “democratic.” Research on evaluation bias shows this method disadvantages minorities: they speak up less, face pressure to conform, and have their dissenting views discounted, which erodes their credibility. Moreover, evaluators tend to favor people who resemble themselves, and with upper‑management dominated by white and South‑Asian men, promotions disproportionately go to those groups. Mentoring initiatives for women exist only at an individual level. Although a formal women‑focused mentorship program is mentioned, I have seen no concrete evidence of its operation. These observations pertain specifically to the data capability; other departments may have different dynamics.

7
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All