Roll20 Reviews

- Incompetent colleagues - Very low salaries - Lots of tech debt and legacy code - Poor 5-year outlook - Management bloat, generally poor and inexperienced managers - Too many inexperienced developers who don't understand how to create robust, production-ready software. - No stocks/options - No moat. There are numerous competitors in this space (Foundry, Tabletop Simulator) that Roll20 cannot meaningfully differentiate itself from and does not offer better features. - Poor work life balance. People often work 50+ hours a week and are logged in after hours/on weekend.

While it's great for me personally, I've seen how flexibility can throw off my team's ability to sync and deliver. Culture is too nice for accountability. They do 360 reviews but I don't feel like I get actionable or critical feedback from my peers, but that's not really different from anywhere I've been before. But it feels like low performers can skate by and the workload inevitably gets picked up by average and high performers. I love my manager, but overall the managers seem pretty inexperienced as people leaders - just people who were promoted for being good ICs. Related to being "too nice" I think they don't know how to hold their teams accountable.