More or less a standard interview process. First round was a phone screen, then a director, then a panel of manager type positions. The final round was four different case studies, one being a take home. I personally thought all of the interviews went fairly well - the team was all very smart and knew their stuff - but in the end, I was offered a position lower than the one I applied for and was dinged for things not in the job description (for example, the job was clearly an IC role, but never having direct reports was one of the things mentioned in the feedback). In all honesty, it felt like an incredible waste of time, all things considered, if the expectations were very clearly outside of the job description.

The interview was very structured, the recruiter was available at each step of the way, very passionate and responsive. I rate the recruiter very highly! I started off with a online test on Codility. I passed. Then I had a video call with a hiring manager for a lead analyst role in their soon-to-open SF bay area office. Some time later the recruiter told me they had a different role for me and wanted me to meet with a different hiring manager. I then met with this hiring manager. I passed this call with him. Then they sent me a take-home assignment, and wanted me to analysis the data and make a presentation and present in the final round. During the final round I met with several people, one of them was a conversation around some ab-test result and the person asked me to explain the result to her and if I would recommend rolling the test out. One of the other person focused on their people principles. The last one was the presentation where I went over my deck with someone. Overall I would say the interview process was very structured, the purpose of each step was clear, and the recruiter always provide prep materials before each round, and update after each round. The only complaint I have is the entire process took more than 60 days, which to me is a bit too long.