nPlan Interview Questions

3 rounds of interviews, - General Interview - Coding challenge: Depending on role, you have a few days to complete it - Interview about coding challenge: About how you approached the challenge and questions about different methods - Value alignment interview Questions about how you fit within the companies value.

First interview attempt was cancelled 5 minutes after it was due to start. Second interview attempt was cancelled 5 minutes after it was due to start. Finally got to interview 30 mins after second attempt with a different person. This person had not seen my CV and didn’t know anything about the role. I was also told it would just be an initial chat but was given loads of competency based questions. The interviewer also stopped the interview to chat on the phone at one point. Waste of everyone’s time. I didn’t get called back for a second interview but would not have accepted anyway.

1. Intro with a member of talent acquisition team. 2. 1hour live tech interview with two devs. 3. 1 hour values alignment with 2 members of non-tech team. 4. feedback from a member of talent acquisition team.

Very confusing, disappointing interview process. Firstly, their HR greeted me with a massive email starting with "Giving you an enjoyable and fair interview experience is really important to us at nPlan". Then I had the first interview where the person tried to role-play which ultimately led to both of us getting confused. They asked follow-up questions constantly and I had to jump between the fictitious world and my actual experience. This led to a poor representation of my skills and, ultimately, a negative interview outcome. What is worst - they couldn't provide me personalised feedback and eventually ghosted me. This was especially needed as all things aside - I thought the interview went well and didn't know where I could have done better. This still isn't clear to me. What's the point of sending a massive welcome email, talking about a fair interview experience when this is the outcome? Disappointing.

I was given a task to do home and when I sent my answers then they decided not to continue with my process. The task was GNN related. They accepted a meeting to discuss what went wrong which was helpfull.

Atrocious interview process. AVOID THIS COMPANY! After a very difficult 6 hour take home test they refused to provide written feedback and were very rude about my request for it. I have never seen a company that does not spend a moment to give written feedback when a candidate has sunk hours into their interview process - ironic given their emphasis on 'values'. 5 stage interview including 1 on 1s, coding tests, take home tests and a final 'values' interview. More than actual FAANG companies! Values that apparently don't include respect for applicants' time.

I was led to believe that the introductory 30-minute interview would be a chat to discuss my experience, interests and what I am looking for in my next role (according to the company's candidate guide). I was even directed to read extensive materials about the company's values and culture. Therefore, I assumed that this would be a general talk with a focus on values. However, what I got in the interview was a formal cross-examination of my portfolio in great detail. I thought that skill tests would be reserved for the 2nd stage of the application, by the means of a practical assessment that would determine skill in a more reliable way than a portfolio examination. Only 1 minute at best was spent talking about values/culture. Not at all what I expected from a company that claims to be 'all about people'. No effort at all was put in by the interviewer to get to know me, all I was asked were technical questions. Not to mention that I was only allowed 3 minutes at the end to ask questions about the role, and the interviewer's overall attitude was nonchalant and even a bit sarcastic at times. Their supposed people-focused attitude was my sole reason for applying.

It was a google meets call. We had 30 minutes to chat. It was a very professional and detailed interview. I was pretty nervous and excited so maybe I misinterpreted some of the questions and didn't focus so well.

A set of few interviews. First a call with the hiring manager (not an HR) and then a technical interview. Overall a very nice process. The process was ok and the hiring manager really tried to make it comfortable

Initial phone call with team member (30 min) asking a range of brief technical, business and soft skills questions Technical interview (1h). Asking to perform data transformation. Pros: - Polite and friendly staff - Convenient online IDE for collaborative tech exercise Cons: - No feedback provided after tech interview, request for feedback ignored