Good for your CV, but not well paid - Transaction Services Analyst KPMG Employee Review

2.0
6 Jan 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good training. ACA qualification. Top clients. If you can suffer the low pay and long hours, and manage to make a move into front office banking, private equity or something similar as soon as you qualify the payoff can be very good.

Cons

Poor remuneration compared to other Big 4s and other professions e.g. Banking and Law. Negligible rewards for good performers - annual bonuses for 2nd year TS analysts who got the top annual review rating in 08 were about £350-£500 after tax. Counterparts at PwC were getting about £2,500 after tax on top of a higher base. Progression is fixed until year 4, so it's difficult to see the point in working hard or trying to impress in years 1-3. Advisory salaries are at some stages lower than audit, despite the longer hours, much higher charge-out rate and arguably more complex work. Significant redundancies have been made at graduate level, with some departments cutting up to 50% of grads - many of whom had first time passes in exams. Work life balance isn't great - you often get given days off in lieu, but this doesn't really compensate for being cut off from your friends for months working 15 hour days in Norwich.

Explore other reviews about KPMG

5.0
16 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

future job moves internal promotions client trust

Cons

Busy season intensity Deadline-driven stress cycles “Always on” expectations during peaks

2.0
17 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

You get to work with an awesome, highly resilient group of local peers in the advisory practice. The KPMG brand still holds value, but the internal team dynamics have become incredibly fractured.

Cons

We have outsourced 80%+ of our Risk Advisory work, leaving onshore seniors with massive gaps in their experience. As a manager, I am stuck doing senior-level work because I typically have only one or zero local seniors or associates on my teams. The best leaders have already resigned because this model prevents actual management and mentoring. Also, it might take you 30+ years to become partner in Risk Advisory, if at all.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All