I submitted a resume through an alum. A recruiter reached out to me for a phone conversation to schedule interview time and gave me resources to prepare. I scheduled the interview a few weeks out so I could review my SQL. I could choose to program in SQL, Python (pandas) or R. One the day of the video call, my interviewer was a little late and wasn't very friendly. He described a database and asked me to write query to get specific information. Then he asked more BI questions on how I'd interpret certain metrics. I ran out of time on both tasks. The second part would benefit from more familiarity with FB-specific ways of measuring growth. I didn't get to the next round.

Firstly, the recruiter emailed me some questions, including basic inquiries about my background, projects I've worked on, and how I approach product cases. The interview process consisted of two rounds, each comprising a mix of technical questions, behavioral assessments, and product case studies. In the initial round, the focus was on technical proficiency, evaluating my knowledge and skills relevant to the role. This involved discussing past projects in detail, demonstrating problem-solving abilities, and assessing my understanding of key concepts within the field. The second round delved deeper into behavioral questions, aiming to gauge my interpersonal skills, communication abilities, and how I approach challenges in a team environment. Additionally, I was presented with more complex product cases, requiring me to analyze scenarios, propose solutions, and articulate my reasoning effectively. Overall, the interview process provided a comprehensive assessment of both my technical capabilities and my suitability for the role in terms of teamwork, problem-solving, and product understanding.