Innovation stifled by involved leadership and layoffs - Anonymous employee Expedia Group Employee Review

3.0
1 May 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Advanced, but not leading, data and product practices.

Cons

Long highly opinionated and overly involved leadership chains slow innovation and erodes ownership of key goals. Being visible is more rewarded than delivering. Cyclical layoffs are highly disruptive. Leadership expects large-scale cultural pivots to bubble up and doesn't own them.

avatar
Expedia Group Response
1mo
Thank you for your feedback. We’re glad to hear you see strength in our data and product practices. Your perspective on leadership, visibility, and ownership highlights areas that matter deeply to us. We’re committed to reinforcing behaviors in which we operate with excellence, foster an ownership mindset, and succeed together through collaboration, ensuring impact and outcomes are what truly matter. We also appreciate your advice on trust, development, and leadership accountability. Feedback like this is important in helping us reflect and focus on what will drive the greatest impact for our teams and the travelers we serve.

Explore other reviews about Expedia Group

5.0
4 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- good benefits - depending on team great culture

Cons

Not every team is the same

2.0
29 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Constant state of transformation is ripe environment for new hires and functional experts from big name tech companies

Cons

Pre-covid the culture was really special. Collaborative, engaging, people-centric, with a unifying mission to enable travel for the world. Since covid there has been a revolving door of executive leadership, and with each round, they throw out the current strategy to try something "new" without building from the current or past successes. Constant change, but no clear vision or strategy of what they are trying to change to. Lack of strategy and low risk tolerance leads to too many priorities with not enough investment to move the needle in anything. Quarterly layoffs, but executed quietly team by team so as not to make news. No psychological safety. Talent strategy since covid is to hire externally over internal promotions to gain "functional expertise" therefore difficult to grow your career. Siloed divisions not working towards common goal. Lacks operating model maturity needed for a company of this size likely do to revolving door of execs and priorities. A cash cow company with an identity crisis trying to be an AI innovator. Build vs buy mentality slows them down. Too many exec pet projects that aren't vetted with proper business cases.

4
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All