employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Department for Work And Pensions

Engaged employer

Department for Work And Pensions Reviews

3.8

71% would recommend to a friend

(2,270 total reviews)
avatar

Peter Schofield

60% approve of CEO

52% positive business outlook

Department for Work And Pensions has an employee rating of 3.8 out of 5 stars, based on 2,270 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Department for Work And Pensions employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Government and public administration industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

2K reviews
1.0
20 Mar 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Generous flexi time and annual leave allowance

Cons

Wide spread bullying and harassment if you come to work for DWP. I had a operation and DWP phoned me 3 times a day, daily, even though i gave them copies of my condition written by the medical expert, my GP report and by the consultant. They knew my operation was scheduled for a certain day and that the recovery time would be 6 weeks or more. My team leader called me up to 3 times a day including on the day of surgery to ask me when i will be returning to work. A colleague of mine had no childcare because her daugther was sick. She was told to make continquency plans to come to work. She was told that her team leader would be expecting her to be at work for 11am, even though her daugther was vomiting and had diarrhoea. The poor worker took her daugther to work and left her to sleep in the staff car park, while she attended work. When the team leader realised this, she then told her to go home. With the coronavirus the management have failed to supply sanitizers to protect staff on the frontline from the virus. A lot of claimants have health problems attend the jobcentre. We are very exposed to the coronavirus within jobcentres andno provisions have been put in place to protect staff. Schools have closed due to the widespread coronavirus but DWP are bullying staff to bring kids to school and to make plans to return to work as we are classed as keyworkers. Not all school have plans for staff who are keyworkers. Daily phone calls from management asking to why you can't come in to work. Lots of favourtism in the department. If your not part of a cliche your out. Or they will plot together to make life difficult for you. That cliche could be people from a certain country who all speak the same mother tongue, peope from the same culture or ethnicity are given favour over those who are not. One particular office in South london have 5 Ghanians and Nigerians as part of the management team, where is the diversity here. If you are not from their culture you don't stand a chance for any promotion or opportunity in their eyes. Same goes for offices where the majority of the management team are all asians or white. This is a common theme in most DWP departments. Segregation springs to mined. DWP haven't a clue about diversity. Their policies on paper are not worth what they are written on as in practice they just don't care about your wellbeing and what happens to you in t your personal life as long as you turn up for work no matter whatthe circumstances.. Disabled colleagues with Underlying health conditions are treated poorly. I know a colleague with a bad back that waited over 3 years before they got her a new chair, even though the work place assessment was completed a long time before. Another colleague brother died and called in to say she won't be at work today as she's naturally grieving. Team leader said " Sorry about your loss but when can we expect you back at work? If you come to work for DWP, take heed as the management will bully and harrass you like nothing you ever experienced before. If your too slow to learn, not fast enough, late for work, have childcare issues, have carer issues, have underlying health problems. Expect to be called up to 3 to 4 times a day and asked " When will you be returning to work?"

1.0
8 Jan 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

During my interview, after having answered the interview panels questions, in relation to the 4 Civil Service Competencies, I had a few questions of my own such as: 1. How long the training will last? The answer was 4 weeks but the group was only given 2-week training and the standard expected was beyond reasonable and ridiculous. One of the members of Staff was quickly reading from the slides when delivering the Training for over an hour. The Module required us (The Group) to have access to our own Smartcards, but due to the highly disorganised Department, we were given a Smartcard when all of the Training was complete and were required to deliver our role ‘to the very highest standard competently and adequately’. Also, when she was delivering the Induction, especially in relation to the Fire Alarm and & Bomb Alarm procedures to be followed when such a situation arose. She was constantly looking at me when mentioning the Bomb Alarm procedure like as if I have a tendency to commit such an act and disregarding the 8 employees who were present in the same room, who need to be informed of the same procedure if such a situation arose. Her approach should've been to inform all members of staff and not single me out like that. However, then she has the audacity to state that she has undertaken the 'unconscious bias' and recommends others to do the same. One of the members of Staff, who was delivering the Training, did provide a great job given the circumstances she was placed in, clearly said that she hasn’t been told as to what our role requires, as she was given a short notice and couldn’t deliver the Training completely, due to the group not being given access to the necessary resources, such as a Smartcard. Another member of Staff, who was delivering the Training, did provide an outstanding job, however, he didn’t tell us how to update the relevant system completely. It was for this reason that the Line Manager could not see the cases, which we had done. Therefore, over 100 cases had to be re-assigned and updated again correctly, so each team member was assigned 20 cases to ensure that they are updated correctly. A third member of Staff, who was delivering the training, provided an outstanding job. He clearly said to the Team Leaders that the standard of work expected from the new starters is beyond reasonable, due to them having no prior benefits experience and expecting them to carry out their own role of Data Gatherers and simultaneously ask for evidence from customers, is the role of a Processor and not a Data Gatherer. Therefore, our sentiment was shared by him which was comforting. 2. Whether there is a Prayer Room? I was told that that the Panel understands that ‘People of my faith and Community Perform prayers. Therefore, it’s not something I should have to worry about’. Also, one of the members of Staff said that there are ‘like-minded individuals like yourself and prayer mats are available’. However, this was far from the truth as there was no ‘Prayer room’ or ‘Prayer mats’ and I hardly met such ‘like-minded individuals.' I've never met such a blatant liar in my life.

Cons

-No access was given to the relevant resources, such as Smartcards or access to the relevant systems at the start of the role, yet we were required 'to carry out our role competently and adequately'. -Even though Bank statements were provided to the Panel, during the interview stage, we all still had Payroll issues for approximately 4 weeks. -Highly disorganised -Constantly being observed by Team Leaders, especially when I used to go to perform my daily prayers. -Legitimate concerns regarding bullying and harassment are brushed under the carpet. -Members of Staff are very selective regarding whom they enforce relevant Policies, relating to Bullying, Harassment & Inappropriate Mobile Phone Usage. For example, mobile phones are strictly not allowed at desks within the Service/Contact Centre. One of the members of Staff made it clear on 15/10/2018 that mobile phones cannot be used or taken out whilst an employee is at their desk, as we will have access to confidential information which needs protecting. Therefore, by adhering to a no mobile phone policy at desks will enable the DWP to deliver the trust and confidence that citizens and other organizations have come to expect from a leading government department. Two team members had their mobile phones out at their desks. The former was making a Snapchat/Instagram video of me, whilst I was dealing with confidential information. The latter was showing me pictures of disabled members of the Royal Family, to substantiate his point regarding epilepsy arising out of close cousin marriages. A team-leading member of staff clearly saw him with his phone being taken out at his desk. However, she came over but didn't say anything to him. This is a clear example of Senior Members of Staff deviating from enforcing the relevant policies, which are in place to protect customer information. Management was informed but did nothing, and as usual, brushed it under the carpet. Both Team Members have been former Civil Servants: the former was an employee at DWP and the latter was an employee at the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs. Therefore, the Standard of Behaviour required from Civil Servants is known to them. However, they failed to adhere to the required standard, therefore, both are clearly not exemplary Civil Servants. -At the start of the role, the focus was on quality and not quantity, however, that changed and the focus was on quantity and quality was being ignored.I dealt with such cases which were completely wrong including the customer's address. -All EO Team Leaders are from a predominant ethnicity and are female, the same applies to HEO's because everyone at that level is female, whereas the only 'Equality & Diversity' is at the AO Level, which is mainly ethnic minorities on Fixed Term Contracts. A prime example of certain roles reserved for certain types and kinds of people, therefore, structural racism. -Treated as a number rather than a person. -No Breaks are given when working overtime on weekends, therefore, causing strain to one's eyes and resulting in headaches. -Private discussions, which are confidential, are disclosed to other members of staff via Skype. -Busybody and Gossipy culture -Conversations are always being eavesdropped by Team Leaders and Team Members -Required to bootlick Team Leaders and Senior Employees to be acknowledged, rather than let one's work ethic and effective time management skills speak for itself. -A Team Member was recording me secretly without my consent and placing me onto his Social Media and subjecting me to mockery and ridicule. Management was informed but decided to brush it under the carpet. - Another Team Member was caught speaking behind my back and when confronted she lied. Thereafter, I told her to take an oath in her mother tongue, she lied under oath and stuttered. Needless to say, Management was informed but decided to brush it under the carpet. However, when I handed my resignation, she was instructed by a managerial member of staff to carry out a cynical performance, to give me the impression that 'her behaviour has changed' therefore 'the matter is being taken seriously'. -A third Team Member was always observing me throughout the whole time. I even caught him through my peripheral vision and looked at him to let him know that I can see you constantly staring at me. He quickly looked away and fixed his eyes to his screen to give me the impression that he is working, which was far from the reality. Management was informed but decided to brush it under the carpet. -I was constantly given dirty looks and stares by the above Team Members, due to them being unable to get information out of me regarding my private life. Also, they viewed me as a rival rather than a team member, my work ethic and many hours of flex credit was causing them 3 a great deal of concern. -Senior Management instructed the above 3 to carry out a cynical performance of ‘changed behaviour’ when I gave my resignation, so I’m given the impression that my legitimate concerns regarding ‘Bullying and Harassment’ are being taken seriously when they have been disregarded for a month.

1.0
19 Jul 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Can not honestly think of any

Cons

Management - never worked anywhere else, have no idea what the real world outside of DWP is like. Incredibly stuck in their ways, talk a lot about "new ways of working" but unable to apply changes to themselves - more and more pointless meetings practically every day, often at few minutes notice and between appointments depriving staff of proper breaks. Overload of pointless emails, overload of pointless group chats on Lync, overload of everything that could possibly distract a WC from the clients they are seeing and then another "motivational" meeting about "providing great customer service" which is simply impossible. Diabolical system to work with (UC) where you have to put n the same information several times over and over again, unhelpful CMs and DMs blocking claims by not doing their parts on time, too much office politics - awful atmosphere to work in. Truly shocking.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 2,270 Reviews

Glassdoor has 2,483 Department for Work And Pensions reviews submitted anonymously by Department for Work And Pensions employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Department for Work And Pensions is right for you.